Terain

Dr Andrew Kaufman MD- His arguments are strongly valid. No scientist has actually isolated or purified the virus, instead they have identified and amplified a tiny piece of genetic material that had a small part they were looking for out of a much larger sequence. They identified a tiny snippet of genetic material, and claimed it was a virus and did nothing more. There was never a particle purified, from which they would extract genetic material and say "this RNA came from this particle, belongs to this particle, and makes up a genome of a virus." To prove the virus caused an illness, they would have to put it into a healthy host and prove that the host developed the same disease. This never happened. The procedure to purify particles was developed long ago they could prove covid if they could isolate a proper particle. They didn't run the test, so they left this step out of the report. This has far reaching implications, as the sample could be RNA from our own cells, exosomes, or from another microbial source. All of the current measures are based on a scientific assumption that hasn't been proven. Casey koerner