"The events leading up to the most notorious crime of the 20 century are almost as shocking as the assassination itself."That is on the cover of Oreillys book Killing Kennedy. If you are going to call yourself an authority on something or a self proclaimed historian then at least be right, especially if you are making millions of dollars as an author and commentator. I tried to give Oreilly the benefit of the doubt while watching him on Kelly Rippa talking about his new WW2 book about the Marines in the Pacific but I cant do this in good conscience. If he completely dropped the ball on JFKs assassination then how do we know that he is right on the money about Truman, Roosevelt and the nukes? It takes guts to stand up against the establishment, Oreilly prides himself on being a Patriot but is he really? The only thing he had to do was not write the book Killing Kennedy and then I would respect him but he refused to do this. He more then likely sold out for the money which makes this even worse. The end of Camelot? He should have received a lot of blowback for that book but I am sure that he didn't. I don't claim to have all the facts but I do the best I can with the info that is presented from sources that I trust. At least I know that I am a lot more accurate then Oreillys sell out book Killing Kennedy. It appears that the average American doesn't seem to dig on their own much less write about it so at least The spin zone character is giving us all somewhat of a history lesson. If you aren't accurate on something as big as JFKs assassination then how can we expect to trust him on anything else? The only thing Oreilly had to do was write a book that didn't claim to be 100% accurate or just not write the book at all. There are many solid sources he could have used Jim Fetzer comes to mind. Its all a joke how just because something isn't talked about in main stream media or establishment sell out books like Killing Kennedy then this makes one a conspiracy theorist.
No comments:
Post a Comment